Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40337075›Full record

ArticleMycoKeys2025

Two new species of

Tanapol Thitla, Jutamart Monkai, Weiqian Meng, Surapong Khuna, Ning Xie, Sinang Hongsanan, Saisamorn Lumyong

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in MycoKeys, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Two new species ofMycoKeys · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tanapol ThitlaShenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Science and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3092-0679
Jutamart MonkaiOffice of Research Administration, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6043-0625
Weiqian MengShenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Science and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3840-0992
Surapong KhunaShenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Science and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1999-4001
Ning XieShenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Science and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5866-8535
Sinang HongsananShenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Science and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0550-3152
Saisamorn LumyongOffice of Research Administration, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6485-414X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waste accumulation in forest regions can have a severe impact on the soil mycobiome. However, research on soil fungi inhabiting forest disposal sites remains limited. Therefore, this study focused on the taxonomy and phylogeny of ascomycetes isolated from soil in forest dump-sites in Chiang Mai, Thailand. The fungal strains were identified using morphological characterisations and multigene phylogenetic reconstruction. A new genus,

Indexed as

Eurotiomycetesnew taxaPseudoleptodontidiumsoil fungiSordariomycetestaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID40337075
PMCPMC12056519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.