Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40337067›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2022

Learning from adversity: Occupational therapy staff experiences of coping during Covid-19.

Laura Ingham, Esther Jackson, Catherine Purcell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Experiences of 'virtual' occupational therapy service delivery in Wales.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2024
    Article
  2. Experiences of the Occupational Therapists During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.Journal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura InghamSwansea Bay University Health Board, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0425-8183
Esther JacksonSwansea Bay University Health Board, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK.
Catherine PurcellSchool of Healthcare Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Heath Park, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0301-2555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Occupational Therapy profession is adaptable and flexible (Thorner (1991) and these characteristics have the potential to act as protective factors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the mechanisms that support coping during adversity can help promote future wellbeing. The aim of this study was to explore how Occupational Therapy staff felt and coped during the first peak of the pandemic. Method: A questionnaire was developed to explore the experiences of Occupational Therapy staff during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The questions explored feelings, mechanisms of support and challenges to both practice and wellbeing. A total of 75 staff responded across one NHS Health Board and reflections were analysed using inductive content analysis. Findings: Staff reflected on how their ability to adapt and remain flexible were protective factors. This combined with supportive family members, friends and colleagues led respondents to reflect on how well they coped. Barriers to coping included organisational challenges, personal challenges and professional challenges. Conclusion: The importance of consistent communication, the need for staff to remain connected to their profession and the importance of engaging in meaningful occupations were highlighted as key to maintaining wellbeing during adversity.

Indexed as

adversityCopingCOVID-19occupational therapywellbeing

Identifiers

PMID40337067
PMCPMC12033574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.