ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2022
The responsiveness of the Danish version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure.
Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Effectiveness of Brief Multidisciplinary Outpatient Treatment for Functional Neurological Disorder: A Pilot Study.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To establish the responsiveness of the Danish version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM-DK). Method: A cross-sectional study was performed in three Danish settings, including 88 clients, 40 men, aged 16-90 years, with a variety of diagnoses. To determine construct responsiveness, the mean changes of the COPM performance and satisfaction score (COPM-P/S) were compared and correlated with the mean changes in the five-item World Health Organization (WHO) Well-Being Index (WHO-5) and the EuroQol-five domains-five levels questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). To determine the responsiveness, data were analysed with ROC curves to establish the optimal cut-point values for the COPM-DK scores. Minimal important change (MIC) was assessed in relation to anchor-based questions. Results: The mean change for COPM-P/S was 3.1 and 3.0, respectively. Small positive correlations were found between the COPM-DK scores and the WHO-5 and EQ-5D-5L scores. The AUC were 0.76 and 0.75, respectively. The optimal cut-point values for the COPM-P/S-scores based on either all positive answers or to the two highest, were 1.2 or 4.20 (COPM-P) and 1.67 or 5.80 (COPM-S), respectively. Conclusions: The capability of the COPM to detect changes in perceived occupational performance issues is supported. We recommend an MIC on 3.5 points on both scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.