Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40337059›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2025

From Statistics to Stories: Unveiling the Epidemiology of Breast Carcinoma in Northwestern India.

Naina Kumar, Kriti Gera, Pinakin Patel, Kamal Kishore Lakhera, Suresh Singh, Bhairulal Gurjar, Arjun Kumar, Pranav Singhal, Bhoopendra Gora, Raj Govind Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Naina KumarDepartment of Surgical Oncology, SMS Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302004 India.ORCID 0000-0003-3470-4156
Kriti GeraDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA.
Pinakin PatelDepartment of Surgical Oncology, SMS Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302004 India.
Kamal Kishore LakheraDepartment of Surgical Oncology, SMS Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302004 India.
Suresh SinghDepartment of Surgical Oncology, SMS Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302004 India.
Bhairulal GurjarDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, SMS Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan India.
Arjun KumarDepartment of Internal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Pranav SinghalDepartment of Surgical Oncology, SMS Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302004 India.
Bhoopendra GoraDepartment of Surgical Oncology, SMS Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302004 India.
Raj Govind SharmaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Attached Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After receiving the pathology report for breast cancer, the first question most patients ask their doctor is about their journey ahead. The type of cancer and how it spreads can give us an idea of what to expect during follow-up. Unfortunately, there is a lack of reporting, management, and documentation of breast cancer cases in India, resulting in a shortage of information on the different types of breast cancer. To address this issue, a study was conducted to gain a better understanding of the pattern of breast carcinoma in Northwestern India. A total of 2619 breast cancer pathology reports were gathered from four major diagnostic centres in Northwest India. Out of all breast cancer patients, 97.74% (2560) were women, while men accounted for only 2.25% (59) of the sample. At the time of diagnosis, 72% of patients were in stages III and IV, while only 28% of patients were in the early stages of cancer (stages I and II). The most common type of breast cancer was infiltrating duct carcinoma (IDC), which constituted 80.71% (2114/2619) of all malignant lesions. infiltrating lobular carcinoma was the second most common pathology, accounting for 5.38% (141/2619) of all cases. The rarer pathologies had a presentation rate below 10%. Our study revealed the most common symptom as a painless lump. Significant majority presented in advanced stages. An alarming 20% presented with foul-smelling ulceration or fungation of the skin. Varied presentations of breast cancer subtypes were evident. As the age-old saying goes-the 'most common' is often ignored as a large portion of the researcher's attention is focused on 'rarer stuff'. Similarly, IDC being the commonest deserves most of our attention. Not just the histology but its grades too. The lack of awareness regarding the risk factors and early detection methods of breast cancer is unfortunately even prevalent in 49% of healthcare workers. What India needs are more data reporting, timely diagnostic strategies, standardized reporting for pathology, and guideline-based management strategies. Increasing data collection electronically in the coming years will help India in displaying more data.

Indexed as

Breast cancerCancer distributionCase seriesEpidemiologyMale breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID40337059
PMCPMC12052726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.