ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2025
Second Primary Malignancies - a Retrospective Analysis from a Regional Cancer Centre of South India.
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The early diagnosis and aggressive treatment in patients diagnosed with a cancer led them to lead a life with a good survival rate. This in turn leads to increase in the number of second primary malignancies. Our article aims to report the prevalence and survival of both synchronous and metachronous second primary malignancies and challenges in treatment by reviewing our retrospective data. A hospital based gathering of retrospective data of the patients diagnosed with second primary malignancies over 9 years from January 2014 to June 2022. Patient details with regards to age, sex, distribution of primary sites, histopathology reports, synchronous or metachronous, treatment details are recorded (Patients fulfilling IARC Definition and Warren Gates criteria). A total of 86 patients were analysed in the retrospective data of whom females contribute the most - 74.4% (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.