ArticlePrecision radiation oncology2024
Enhanced Electroacoustic Tomography with Supervised Learning for Real-time Electroporation Monitoring.
Article in Precision radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A single-view-based electroacoustic tomography imaging using deep learning for electroporation monitoring.Medical physics · 2026Article
- AAV9-Mimetic Peptides and Electroporation Synergistically Enhance Nanoparticle Transport through the Blood-Brain Barrier.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2026Article
- A Physics-Informed Neural Network forResearch square · 2026Article
- Editorial: 2Precision radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Engineered anti-cancer nanomedicine for synergistic cuproptosis-immunotherapy.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Non-contact electroacoustic tomography with optical interferometer for electroporation therapy monitoring.Applied physics letters · 2025Article
- Enhanced Electroacoustic Tomography with Supervised Learning for Real-time Electroporation Monitoring.Precision radiation oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEF)-based electroporation is a new therapy modality potentially synergized with radiation therapy to improve treatment outcomes. To verify its treatment accuracy intraoperatively, electroacoustic tomography (EAT) has been developed to monitor in-vivo electric energy deposition by detecting ultrasound signals generated by nsPEFs in real-time. However, utility of EAT is limited by image distortions due to the limited-angle view of ultrasound transducers. Methods: This study proposed a supervised learning-based workflow to address the ill-conditioning in EAT reconstruction. Electroacoustic signals were detected by a linear array and initially reconstructed into EAT images, which were then fed into a deep learning model for distortion correction. In this study, 56 distinct electroacoustic data sets from nsPEFs of different intensities and geometries were collected experimentally, avoiding simulation-to-real-world variations. Forty-six data were used for model training and 10 for testing. The model was trained using supervised learning, enabled by a custom rotating platform to acquire paired full-view and single-view signals for the same electric field. Results: The proposed method considerably improved the image quality of linear array-based EAT, generating pressure maps with accurate and clear structures. Quantitatively, the enhanced single-view images achieved a low-intensity error (RMSE: 0.018), high signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR: 35.15), and high structural similarity (SSIM: 0.942) compared to the reference full-view images. Conclusions: This study represented a pioneering stride in achieving high-quality EAT using a single linear array in an experimental environment, which improves EAT's utility in real-time monitoring for nsPEF-based electroporation therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.