Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40336951›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2025

Predictive Factors for Procedure Time for Closure of Mucosal Defect Following Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

Hideaki Kazumori, Rurika Masatsugu, Kousuke Fukuda, Koji Onishi, Yasuhiko Ohno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hideaki KazumoriDepartment of Gastroenterology Matsue Seikyo General Hospital Matsue Shimane Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9343-0788
Rurika MasatsuguDepartment of Gastroenterology Matsue Seikyo General Hospital Matsue Shimane Japan.
Kousuke FukudaDepartment of Gastroenterology Matsue Seikyo General Hospital Matsue Shimane Japan.
Koji OnishiDepartment of Gastroenterology Matsue Seikyo General Hospital Matsue Shimane Japan.
Yasuhiko OhnoDepartment of Gastroenterology Matsue Seikyo General Hospital Matsue Shimane Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Goals: The present study was conducted to clarify predictive factors related to procedure time for closure of a mucosal defect following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Background: To prevent complications following a colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedure, closure of the resultant mucosal defect is considered to be most effective. However, closure after colorectal ESD is challenging, and technical difficulties can lead to a longer procedure time. Although it is important to clarify predictive factors related to the time needed for effective treatment planning, no such validated data obtained prior to the present study have been reported. Study: Overall, 61 consecutive patients who underwent colorectal ESD for a colorectal neoplasm sized greater than 20 mm were enrolled. Immediately after performing colorectal ESD, closure of the mucosal defect was implemented using a loop clip closure method. Factors with influence on closure procedure time were evaluated using multiple linear regression analyses. Results: Results obtained with a multiple linear regression model demonstrated that resected specimen size ( Conclusions: Findings obtained in this study were helpful to clarify predictive factors with influence on procedure time. The fit of the model was good, thus allowing for closure performance based on outcome prediction.

Indexed as

clip closure methodcolorectal neoplasmloop clip closure methodmultiple linear regression model

Identifiers

PMID40336951
PMCPMC12056711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.