ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
# Language processing characteristics in normal pressure hydrocephalus: insights from eye-tracking analysis of incorrect responses.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In patients with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH), the aging process results in decreased efficiency of cerebrospinal fluid circulation, leading to ventricular enlargement. This enlargement compresses several brain structures, impairing functions such as visual perception, semantic memory processing, and phonological encoding contributing to language processing difficulties. This study examines real-time language processing in NPH patients and healthy elderly (HE) controls by comparing their eye movements during correct and incorrect responses in a lexical retrieval task (LRT). Methods: A total of 26 subjects participated, comprising 14 patients diagnosed with NPH (aged 65 or older) and 12 individuals in the HE group. A lexical retrieval task was administered as their eye movements were recorded. A Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare LRT performance and eye-tracking metric results across different groups, respectively. Also, correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationship between LRT scores and eye-tracking scores. A two-way mixed ANOVA was conducted to assess the significance of eye-tracking metrics depending on response type (correct/incorrect). Additionally, a qualitative and quantitative comparison of heatmaps and scanpaths was conducted to visualize eye-tracking data for correct and incorrect items. Results: The NPH group exhibited significantly lower performance in lexical retrieval compared to the HE group, accompanied by more counts and longer durations in both fixation and saccade metrics. A negative correlation was noted between LRT scores and eye-tracking metric values, with correlation coefficients predominantly at 0.50 or higher. Analysis of eye movements during correct and incorrect responses uncovered significant group and within-group effects across all metrics, with more intergroup differences during incorrect responses. Qualitative differences in eye movements were more noticeable in images associated with incorrect items. Discussion: This study highlights previously under-explored language deficits in NPH patients using real-time visual processing analysis, underscoring the importance of targeted language interventions for these populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.