ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2025
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The principal roles of the pericardium include protection from microorganisms, prevention of cardiac friction, and restriction of unlimited dilation of the heart. In the case of a congenital pericardial defect in which structural, electrophysiological, and haemodynamic abnormalities manifested during postural changes, we propose another indispensable pericardial function of cardiac central anchorage. Case summary: A 29-year-old man with atypical chest pain was referred to our hospital. Electrocardiography revealed fluctuations in the QRS transitional zone, electrical axis, and atrial polarity with body posture. Echocardiography revealed a far dorsally displaced heart, paradoxical motion of the interventricular septum (IVS), and hyperdynamic motion of the posterior wall in the left lateral decubitus position, which normalized to the right lateral decubitus position, along with significant haemodynamic alterations. Multidetector-row computed tomography revealed a complete absence of the left pericardium. Discussion: When pericardial fixation is impaired, the heart falls dorsally owing to gravity in the left lateral decubitus position, resulting in right ventricular overstretch and enlargement, which, in turn, results in compression of the left ventricle via a leftward shift of the IVS and a consequent reduction in cardiac output. Moreover, the energy generated by the myocardium, which should normally be concentrated only on blood ejection, would be distributed between the energy used for ejection and that used for the leap-up movement of the heart, reducing its energy efficiency. Through detailed observation of the congenital pericardial defect, haemodynamic insights into the important functions of the pericardium, which were not visible through static observation, were obtained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.