ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2025
Pharmacovigilance analysis of small bowel bleeding associated with NSAIDs.
Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Currently, the factors influencing small bowel bleeding caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) remain unclear. Objectives: This study aimed to assess NSAID-associated small bowel bleeding and evaluate the impact of other drugs on it through a pharmacovigilance study, thereby providing valuable insights for clinical practice. Design: Data on NSAID-associated small bowel bleeding were retrospectively extracted from two public adverse drug reaction databases-the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the Japan Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency's Adverse Drug Event Reporting (JADER)-from 2004 to 2023 for further analysis. Methods: The reporting odds ratio (ROR), a pharmacovigilance technique, was employed to identify signals of adverse reactions, and the Chi-square test was utilized to assess differences between groups. Results: Multiple NSAIDs associated with small bowel bleeding were identified in both databases. In the drug combination analysis, no significant differences in the risk of small bowel bleeding were found between NSAIDs combined with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and NSAIDs alone in FAERS (all Conclusion: PPIs did not show a significant impact on NSAIDs-associated small bowel bleeding, while rebamipide and probiotics may exhibited a preventive effect against NSAIDs-associated small bowel bleeding. Older adults and males constituted risk factors for aspirin-associated small bowel bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.