Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40336845›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2025

Occupational therapist's involvement in social prescribing: A qualitative interview study.

Gemma Bradley, Beth Atkin, Helen Atkin, Jason Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gemma BradleyDepartment of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0031-964X
Beth AtkinDepartment of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.
Helen AtkinDepartment of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.
Jason ScottDepartment of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Social prescribing is a process of helping people to access non-medical activities to promote well-being. For occupational therapists, this is not new, although the social prescribing agenda is creating new roles around these approaches. This study aimed to explore how occupational therapists were involved in social prescribing in the United Kingdom and how they would like to contribute to future developments. Method: Semistructured interviews were carried out with 19 occupational therapists who identified they were involved in social prescribing activities. Findings: Thematic analysis led to two over-arching themes: (1) position and identity; and (2) making it work. Conclusion: Participants perceived similarity with social prescribing, leading to difficulty in positioning occupational therapy alongside this role, emotional responses and identity challenge. Points of distinction between the roles were articulated, including occupational therapy being more medical, having oversight of more complex needs and having more senior roles within teams. To manage workflow, occupational therapists delegate to social prescribing workers, although there is a lack of clarity about competence and varying involvement in supervision. Part of desired future involvement included clearer workflow, occupational therapy involvement in supervision and service development and creating legitimacy for both roles to address social determinants of health.

Indexed as

Occupational therapyqualitative researchsocial prescribing

Identifiers

PMID40336845
PMCPMC11887915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.