ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Orthopedic applications of 3D printing in canine veterinary medicine.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconstruction of an orbital fracture in a mare using a 3D-printed patient-specific implant.Veterinary surgery : VS · 2026Article
- Physical models and simulators in veterinary education: current status, learning impact, and future perspectives.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Cronodent I, 3D interactive manual for self-learning of the dental chronology of equines.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This case series investigates the application of 3D printing in veterinary orthopedic surgeries, emphasizing its potential to enhance preoperative planning, intraoperative precision, and postoperative outcomes. Animals: Three canines-German Shepherd, Basset Hound, and Labrador Retriever-were included in this study. Materials and methods: Three canine cases involving complex orthopedic deformities were selected to illustrate different uses of 3D printing in veterinary surgery. CT scans were segmented using Materialise Mimics 26.0, followed by virtual surgical planning and creation of 3D printed models and guides. Results: In Case 1, a 2-year-old German Shepherd with a congenital right tibial deformity underwent successful surgical correction aided by a preoperatively prepared external fixator frame, saving approximately 1 h of OR time. In Case 2, a 1-year-old Basset Hound with a left antebrachial deformity had a double wedge osteotomy performed with the assistance of patient-specific cutting and reconstruction guides, leading to optimal alignment and reduced surgical time. Case 3 involved a young, less than 1-year-old Labrador Retriever rescue with severe bilateral tibiofemoral deformity, where 3D printed models helped the surgeon determine that surgery was not the best option, potentially preventing a poor outcome. Clinical relevance: This case series highlights the transformative potential of 3D printing in veterinary orthopedic surgery, illustrating its ability to improve aid surgical outcomes, reduce operative times, and be a valuable tool in preoperative decision-making. This technology allows for tailored surgical interventions, enhancing the precision and effectiveness of treatment plans in veterinary medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.