ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation in younger children with ventricular arrhythmias.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial: New advances in cardiac electrophysiology.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Arrhythmias in Pediatric Age: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: To compare the clinical characteristics of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in younger vs. older children, and to explore the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in the treatment of VAs in young children. Methods: General data, surgical data, and prognosis of all children with VAs who underwent RFCA at our hospital between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2022 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two groups according to age: younger (<4 years); and older (≥4 years). Results: Data from 762 children with VAs were analysed, including 96 younger children (3.47 ± 0.75 years, 16.74 ± 3.98 kg) and 666 older children (9.44 ± 2.86 years, 38.85 ± 15.11 kg). Compared with the older group, there were more premature ventricular beats with ventricular tachycardia, earlier surgery, and more ablations under x-ray fluoroscopy in the younger group. The right ventricular outflow tract was the most common arrhythmia focus in both groups, followed by the tricuspid annulus in the younger group and the left ventricular septum in the older group. The acute success rates for younger and older children were 99.0% and 98.6%, respectively. The recurrence and complication rates in the two groups were similar, and there was no significant difference in radiation dose. Conclusions: The safety and efficacy of RFCA in the treatment of younger children with VAs were similar to those of older children. RFCA appears to be a viable therapeutic option for young children with drug-resistant VAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.