Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40336721›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2024

Identifying characteristics of stroke patients benefiting from interprofessional collaboration.

Kohei Ikeda, Satoshi Sasada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kohei IkedaDepartment of Health & Social Work, School of Rehabilitation, Div. Occupational Therapy, Kanagawa University of Human Services, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5228-4143
Satoshi SasadaDepartment of Health & Social Work, School of Rehabilitation, Div. Occupational Therapy, Kanagawa University of Human Services, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study identifies the patient population that may benefit from interprofessional collaboration in the support of patients with cerebrovascular diseases. Method: This study involved 170 patients who received treatment in Japan's recovery rehabilitation wards in December 2019-June 2020. Participants were categorized into three groups based on their functional independence measure (FIM) scores at admission, distinguishing between complete dependence, modified dependence, and independence groups. They were classified into the group with higher collaborative practice (HCP) and the group with lower collaborative practice (LCP) based on the median value of the therapist collaborative practice scale (TCPS). The primary outcomes measured were FIM efficiency and FIM effectiveness. The main effects and interactions of the level of independence with activities of daily living (ADL) and collaboration were examined using a two-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni multiple comparison tests. Results: The level of independence with ADL and collaboration had an interaction effect related to FIM effectiveness ( Conclusion: Interprofessional collaboration may improve ADL in patients with high ADL independence at admission. Furthermore, the interprofessional collaboration quality impacted patients' ADL improvement.

Indexed as

activities of daily livingInterprofessional collaborationstroke survivor

Identifiers

PMID40336721
PMCPMC11887892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.