ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Toward interpretable expected goals modeling using Bayesian mixed models.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modelling the effect of motivation on mental health components with fuzzy logic among elite athletes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Empowered by technological progress, sports teams and bookmakers strive to understand relationships between player and team activity and match outcomes. For this purpose, the probability of an event to succeed (e.g., the probability of a goal to be scored, namely, xG for eXpected Goals) provides insightful information on team and player performance and helps statistical and machine learning approaches predict match outcomes. However, recent approaches require powerful but complex models that need more inherent interpretability for practitioners. This study uses a Bayesian generalized linear mixed-effects model to introduce a simple and interpretable xG modeling approach. The model provided similar performance when compared to the StatsBomb model (property of the StatsBomb company) using only seven variables relating to shot type and position, and surrounding opponents (AUC = 0.781 and 0.801, respectively). Pre-trained models through transfer learning are suitable for identifying teams' strengths and weaknesses using small sample sizes and enable interpretation of the model's predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.