ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2025
Prediction of High-Dose Methotrexate Blood Concentration in Osteosarcoma Patients Using Machine Learning.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From imaging to omics: deep learning is bridging MRI and liquid biopsy in bone tumor diagnosis.Journal of bone oncology · 2026Review
- Precision Pediatric Cancer Nanomedicine: Advancing Personalized Nano Therapies to Reduce Non-Communicable Diseases Through AI-Driven 3D-Printed Drugs.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Predicting the blood concentration of levetiracetam in people with epilepsy using machine learning and real-world data.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Models Reveal New Risk Factors for Sub-/Supra-Therapeutic Concentrations of Sirolimus in Children with Vascular Anomalies.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: High-dose methotrexate is a typical chemotherapy that is widely used in the treatment of osteosarcoma. However, the unique dose-response relationship of methotrexate makes its treatment window relatively narrow, and its clinical use is in a dilemma: either the drug concentration in the patient's body cannot reach the effective concentration level, or adverse reactions may occur due to drug overdose. For this circumstance, monitoring and predicting the drug concentration in the patient's body is well founded and necessary. While pharmacokinetic models exist, they often oversimplify patient-specific covariates. This study addresses the unmet need for early-exposure prediction through interpretable machine learning, enabling data-driven decisions before toxicity manifestation. Methods: In this article, 68 osteosarcoma patients' information including demography, administration and assay was gathered. We analyzed medical data and selected 10 important features using a random forest, including hydration status, red blood cell distribution width coefficient of variation, platelet distribution width, creatinine, γ-glutamyl transferase, large platelet ratio, serum potassium, lactate dehydrogenase, weight, and prealbumin. Then, cross-validation and SHAP has been conducted to confirm the robust and interpretation of the model. Results: On this basis, 7 machine learning regression models was built to predict the blood concentration of methotrexate. R Discussion: This machine learning framework addresses a critical gap in high-dose methotrexate therapeutic monitoring by achieving early and personalized blood drug concentration prediction, allowing for personalized dosing of patients based on predicted concentrations. The interpretability of SHAP-derived feature importance enhances clinical utility, offering a paradigm shift from reactive toxicity management to proactive precision dosing in osteosarcoma therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.