ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Comparison of lateral parapatellar vs. infrapatellar approaches for intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Tibial Nail Entry Point Location Among Infrapatellar, Suprapatellar, and Lateral Parapatellar Approaches Using Postoperative 3D-CT.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- [Intramedullary nailing of the tibia : Tips and tricks in borderline indications].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing (IMN) using the lateral parapatellar entry (LPE) and infrapatellar (IP) surgical approaches. Methods: A total of 85 patients with tibial shaft fractures treated with IMN between January 2019 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 40 and 45 patients underwent IMN using the LPE and IP surgical approaches, respectively. The operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, blood loss, closed reduction rate, fracture healing time and complications were reviewed in this study. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale were used as functional measurements. Results: The study included 85 patients (40 in the LPE group and 45 in the IP group), with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. No significant differences were found in fracture healing time, closed reduction rate, infection, deformity healing rate, Lysholm scores, and AOFAS scores between the groups. The LPE group displayed an significantly shorter operation duration, less blood loss, fewer fluoroscopy times, and a lower average VAS score compared to the IP group ( Conclusions: The LPE approach for IMN in tibial shaft fractures may offer advantages in terms of fewer fluoroscopy times, and lower complication rates, suggesting it could be a preferable surgical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.