ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2024
What Next? Learning from the findings of the Royal College of Occupational Therapists workforce survey 2022-2023.
Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Career planning and development for occupational therapists working in mental health: A scoping review.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2025Review
- Education of Occupational Therapists in Mental Health: A Global Survey of Educators Regarding Perceived Facilitators and Barriers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Stakeholder Perspectives on Retention Strategies for Rehabilitation Professionals: A Qualitative Study.Qualitative health research · 2024Article
- The problems and potential for emotional labour in occupational therapy.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2024Article
- What Next? Learning from the findings of the Royal College of Occupational Therapists workforce survey 2022-2023.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.