ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025
Post-pandemic excess mortality of COVID-19 in Hong Kong: a retrospective study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cytomegalovirus DNAemia in Hospitalized Adults With SARS-CoV-2 Infection Requiring Supplemental Oxygen: Virologic and Clinical Characteristics and Association With Outcomes.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Trial
- Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir on post-COVID diabetes risk among an older adult cohort: a target trial emulation study.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Postpandemic Change in Demographic and Clinical Features of Patients With Omicron Who Were Hospitalized: Territory-Wide Retrospective Repeated Cross-Sectional Study in Hong Kong.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in reducing the risk of short-term and long-term cardiovascular complications of COVID-19: a target trial emulation study.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As the COVID-19 pandemic shifted into the post-pandemic period in early 2023, following the COVID-19 normalization with relaxation of stringent control measures and high vaccination coverage in Hong Kong, its long-term impact on mortality remains challenging with necessary needs of data-driven insights. This study examined the pattern of post-pandemic excess mortality in Hong Kong. Methods: We analyzed weekly inpatient death data from public hospitals from January 1, 2013, to June 1, 2024, using a mixed model with over-dispersed Poisson regression. Expected mortality was estimated as the difference between observed mortality and baseline derived from pre-pandemic data. Age-stratified analyses of overall and cause-specific mortality were conducted across the pre-Omicron pandemic, Omicron, and post-pandemic periods. Findings: In the post-pandemic period, the excess mortality declined but remained six-fold higher (37.66 [95% CI: 32.72-42.60] per 100,000) than pre-Omicron level, maintaining significance after adjusting for age (32.79 [95% CI: 28.13-37.46] per 100,000). The older population experienced sustained excess mortality, with crude estimates of 100.51 and 586.74 per 100,000 among those aged 65-79 years and ≥80 years, respectively, primarily due to respiratory diseases. Younger population showed near-zero overall excess mortality, whereas increased excess mortality among them occurred in heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and injuries. Interpretation: Our findings highlight the lasting mortality impact of pandemic among vulnerable populations, specifically the older population, possibly due to the post-COVID conditions and circulating COVID-19, suggesting the need for targeted interventions for this group. Funding: Health and Medical Research Fund.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.