ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2023
The reliability and validity of the cone evasion walk test in patients with hip osteoarthritis.
Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Psychometric Properties of the Cone Evasion Walk Test in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.Occupational therapy international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hip osteoarthritis (OA) can result in joint pain, stiffness, compromised balance, hindered mobility, and decreased functional independence. The Cone Evasion Walk Test (CEW) was designed for evaluating balance by evaluating the capacity to evade obstacles. Consequently, the study's objective was to assess the validity and reliability of the CEW in hip OA patients. Methods: A total of 24 patients with hip OA were enrolled. Patients performed trials for the CEW and the timed up and go test (TUG). Between the trials, patients rested for an hour. The falls within the previous 12-month period were reported. Results: The analysis showed that the CEW has excellent reliability and high validity in hip OA. ( Conclusions: The CEW is effective for evaluating the function, dynamic balance, and mobility in patients with hip OA and could be a more accurate measure of the dynamic balance activities in the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.