ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
The evolution of three-dimensional knee kinematics after ACL reconstruction within one year.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-education via contralateral-limb balance training improves gait speed and sagittal-plane knee motion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Comparing kinematic and kinetic demands on the knee joint during selected physiotherapy exercises and activities of daily living.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to explore the dynamic changes in the six degrees of freedom (6DOF) kinematics of the knee joint in patients within one year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), combined with clinical scoring systems to analyze functional recovery characteristics, providing scientific evidence for optimizing postoperative rehabilitation strategies. Methods: The study enrolled 49 patients followed up at 3 months postoperatively, 33 patients at 6 months, and 35 patients at 12 months. Twenty-nine healthy controls were recruited. A three-dimensional motion capture system was used to collect 6DOF knee kinematic data at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, including flexion-extension, internal-external rotation, adduction-abduction angles, and anterior-posterior, distal-proximal, medial-lateral translation data. Clinical function was assessed using the IKDC and KOOS scores. One Way ANOVA of one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping (SPM1D) was used to assess the changes in gait kinematics and differences compared to healthy controls. Results: After ACLR, the IKDC and KOOS scores of patients significantly improved between 3 and 12 months postoperatively, showing good subjective functional recovery. Over the course of one year, the knee kinematic data of gait has gradually recovered. However, abnormalities in knee joint kinematics still exist. In the coronal plane, the adduction angle of the knee joint during motion is relatively large (p < 0.05); In the sagittal plane, the flexion angle increased during the standing phase (p < 0.05); In the transverse plane, the internal rotation angle of the knee joint increased compared to the controls (p < 0.05). The range of motion of flexion and rotational angles decreased compared to the controls (p < 0.05). Discussion: The kinematic recovery of the knee joint in ACLR patients presents multidimensional characteristics and dynamic changes. The recovery rates and patterns differ significantly across dimensions, with some abnormalities not fully corrected within one-year post-urgery. These findings provide scientific evidence for individualized rehabilitation strategies, emphasizing the need for strengthening joint stability and range of motion recovery in the early postoperative phase (0-6 months) and focusing on correcting rotational and flexion-extension function during the later phase (6-12 months) to further improve knee function and prevent long-term adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.