Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40336544›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

No Evidence for Male Retaliation in a Population With High Level of Extra-Pair Paternity.

Helga Gyarmathy, Renáta Kopena, Tünde Kneifel, Fanni Sarkadi, Eszter Szöllősi, Eszter Szász, János Török, Balázs Rosivall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Helga GyarmathyBehavioural Ecology Group, Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology ELTE Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0021-1521
Renáta KopenaBehavioural Ecology Group, Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology ELTE Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary.
Tünde KneifelBehavioural Ecology Group, Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology ELTE Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary.
Fanni SarkadiBehavioural Ecology Group, Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology ELTE Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary.
Eszter SzöllősiBehavioural Ecology Group, Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology ELTE Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary.
Eszter SzászBehavioural Ecology Group, Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology ELTE Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary.
János TörökBehavioural Ecology Group, Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology ELTE Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary.
Balázs RosivallBehavioural Ecology Group, Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology ELTE Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extra-pair paternity (EPP) is a widespread phenomenon, as EPP has been observed in 76% of the socially monogamous bird species. Many hypotheses try to explain the evolution of infidelity. While females may participate in extra-pair copulations, for instance, to ensure the fertilisation of their eggs or to obtain potential genetic benefits for their offspring, unfaithful females face many potential costs too. As nestling provisioning is one of, if not the most energetically costly forms of parental care, the certainty of paternity hypothesis predicts that males with an unfaithful partner reduce their parental investment to avoid the fitness loss arising from rearing unrelated nestlings. We investigated the relationship between the presence and proportion of extra-pair young (EPY) and the feeding rate of the social male to reveal whether males recognise and penalise unfaithfulness. We conducted the study in a Hungarian population of collared flycatchers (

Indexed as

certainty of paternitycuckoldryextra‐pair matingfeeding frequencymating costpaternal investment

Identifiers

PMID40336544
PMCPMC12058304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.