ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2025
Lapdoctor: Multicentre Validation of a Scoring System for Preoperative Evaluation of Difficulty of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy.
Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05769686 (LAParoscopic DOnor nephreCTomy scORe), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
LAParoscopic DOnor nephreCTomy scORe (LAPDOCTOR) Multicenter Validation of a New Scoring System for Preoperative Prediction of Difficulty of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We previously developed and validated LAPDOCTOR (LAParoscopic-Donor-nephreCTomy-scORe), a novel scoring system for the preoperative assessment of the difficulty of living donor nephrectomy (LDN). To prove its significance, we extended our investigation to a prospective, multicenter, national study. Difficulty was assessed by the operating surgeon using a scale from 1 to 3 (1-standard, 2-moderately difficult, 3-very difficult) based on eight parameters: availability of laparoscopic space, mobilization of the colon, kidney, gonadal, adrenal and renal vein, renal artery, and ureter. Donor CT-scans were blindly reviewed by a radiologist, and the LAPDOCTOR scores were compared with the difficulty levels assigned by the surgeon to investigate the match rates. One hundred eighty-five donors were enrolled, with a mean age of 54 years (range 24-77), BMI 25 kg/m2 (range 17-35), and male/female 59/126. LDN was blindly scored as standard in 45% of the cases, moderately-difficult in 52%, and very-difficult in 3%. The agreement between the LAPDOCTOR and expert donor surgeons' rate in categorizing LDN into risk groups had a QWK of 0.711 (95% CI 0.577-0.844) with p < 0.001. The LAPDOCTOR enables precise preoperative determination of the difficulty of LDN, particularly in very difficult cases, and assessment of surgical risk in living kidney donors. Clinical Trial Notation: https://ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT05769686.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.