ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Using the Single-Leg Hop Test to Determine Knee Extension Strength After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inter-limb sensorimotor and functional performance asymmetries in elite wrestlers with unilateral knee injury.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Strength assessment and the single-leg hop test are used to assess an athlete's readiness to return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Other factors may confound this relationship, limiting the clinical utility of the single-leg hop test. Purposes: To determine whether the relationship between single-leg hop performance and knee extension/flexion torque is affected by confounding variables and to assess whether the strength of the ACL-reconstructed limb could be predicted using the single-leg hop distance. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Included were 35 men (age, 29.5 ± 6 years; weight, 83.5 ± 8.9 kg) who had undergone ACLR with hamstring tendon autografts. A homogeneous participant population was intentionally recruited to limit variation in outcome measures, increasing the likelihood of successfully predicting strength. The single-leg hop distance and knee extension/flexion strength were assessed. Correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the relationship between single-leg hop test, knee extension/flexion strength, and age. Linear modeling was used to predict knee extension strength, and logistic regression was used to predict which participants met commonly used clinical cutoff values of strength symmetry-measured as the limb symmetry index (LSI). Results: Strength variables were moderately related to knee extension strength and the single-leg hop distance, although these relationships exhibited wide 95% CIs. The mean error when predicting knee extension strength based on the single-leg hop distance, eccentric knee flexion strength, and age was 0.38 N·m/kg (18%). Eight participants (23%) were incorrectly classified as having a knee extension strength LSI of <85% when using logistic regression to determine whether clinical cutoff values for symmetry were met. Conclusion: Although the relationship between the single-leg hop test and knee extension strength was moderate, this relationship was imprecise, and predicting strength based on the single-leg hop test resulted in a clinically meaningful amount of error. Based on study findings, it is unlikely that the single-leg hop test provides clinical utility if the goal is to assess knee extension strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.