ArticleIEEE transactions on computational imaging2024
Multi-Scale Energy (MuSE) framework for inverse problems in imaging.
Article in IEEE transactions on computational imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regularized Joint Reconstruction and Slab Combination for Accelerated Three-Dimensional Multi-Slab Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Using Multi-Scale Energy Models.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- End-to-End Trained Energy-Based Model for Image Recovery.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Diffusion probabilistic generative models for accelerated, in-NICU permanent magnet neonatal MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- ACCELERATING QUANTITATIVE MRI USING SUBSPACE MULTISCALE ENERGY MODEL (SS-MUSE).Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2025Article
- FAST MULTI-CONTRAST MRI USING JOINT MULTISCALE ENERGY MODEL.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2025Article
- MAP Image Recovery with Guarantees using Locally Convex Multi-Scale Energy (LC-MUSE) Model.Proceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. ICASSP (Conference) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We introduce multi-scale energy models to learn the prior distribution of images, which can be used in inverse problems to derive the Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) estimate and to sample from the posterior distribution. Compared to the traditional single-scale energy models, the multi-scale strategy improves the estimation accuracy and convergence of the MAP algorithm, even when it is initialized far away from the solution. We propose two kinds of multi-scale strategies: a) the explicit (e-MuSE) framework, where we use a sequence of explicit energies, each corresponding to a smooth approximation of the original negative log-prior, and b) the implicit (i-MuSE), where we rely on a single energy function whose gradients at different scales closely match the corresponding e-MuSE gradients. Although both schemes improve convergence and accuracy, the e-MuSE MAP solution depends on the scheduling strategy, including the choice of intermediate scales and exit conditions. In contrast, the i-MuSE formulation is significantly simpler, resulting in faster convergence and improved performance. We compare the performance of the proposed MuSE models in the context of Magnetic Resonance (MR) image recovery. The results demonstrate that the multi-scale framework yields a MAP reconstruction comparable in quality to the End-to-End (E2E) trained models, while being relatively unaffected by the changes in the forward model. In addition, the i-MuSE scheme also allows the generation of samples from the posterior distribution, enabling us to estimate the uncertainty maps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.