ArticleInternational journal of population data science2025
Spatio-temporal forecasting of COVID-19 cases in the Netherlands for source and contact tracing.
Article in International journal of population data science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Source and contact tracing (SCT) is a core public health measure that is used to contain the spread of infectious diseases. It aims to identify a source of infection, and to advise those who have been exposed to this source. Due to the rapid increases in incidence of COVID-19 in the Netherlands, the capacity to conduct a full SCT quickly became insufficient. Therefore, the public health services (PHS) might benefit from a restricted strategy targeted to geographical regions where (predicted) case-to-case transmission is high. In this study, we set out to develop a prediction model for the number of COVID-19 cases per postal code within the Netherlands using geographic and demographic features. The study population consists of individuals residing in one of the participating nine Dutch PHS regions who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between 1 June 2020 and 27 February 2021. Using a machine learning random forest regression model, we predicted the top 100 postal codes with the highest number of cases with an accuracy of 49% for the current week, 42% for next week, and 44% for two weeks from present. In addition, the age groups of 20-39 and 40-64 years had a higher prediction accuracy than groups outside these age ranges. The developed model provides a starting point for targeted preventive SCT efforts that incorporate geospatial and demographic characteristics of a neighbourhood. It should nonetheless be noted that during the early stages of the outbreak, the number of available datapoints needed to inform such models are likely insufficient. Given the accuracy and data requirements of the developed model, it is unlikely that this class of models can play a pivotal role in informing policy during the early phases of a future epidemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.