Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40336470›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2025

Perceptions of nurse-physician interactions: insights from medical students' clinical internships.

Anna Bovo, Mayra Veronese, Renzo Zanotti, Matteo Danielis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna BovoLaboratory of Studies and Evidence Based Nursing, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7262-4857
Mayra VeroneseLaboratory of Studies and Evidence Based Nursing, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5176-6231
Renzo ZanottiLaboratory of Studies and Evidence Based Nursing, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7386-211X
Matteo DanielisLaboratory of Studies and Evidence Based Nursing, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7417-3452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInterprofessional Collaboration (IPC) brings together health and social care professionals to enhance patient outcomes through mutual respect, effective communication, and shared responsibility. However, while Interprofessional Education (IPE) is essential for improving communication and care quality, its implementation remains challenging. One major obstacle is the cultural and historical difference in how nurses and physicians perceive IPC, which can hinder effective collaboration. PURPOSE: To explore medical students' perspectives of nurse-physician interactions.

methodsThis qualitative descriptive study examined written reports from 406 second-year medical students enrolled at the University of Padua. To identify patterns in nurse-physician interactions, data were analysed using Bales' Interaction Process Analysis categories through a deductive content analysis approach. Additionally, qualitative analysis software facilitated the coding process, with Bales' category integrated into ATLAS® Search&Code for text analysis. Furthermore, this research was conducted and reported in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines.

resultsA total of 438 student-reported detections were extracted from the reports and categorised into 12 of the Bales' social interaction categories, revealing distinct roles and communication styles between nurses and physicians. Students detailed that nurses frequently provided opinions and orientations, reflecting a supportive role, while physicians were more inclined to seek orientation, indicating a collaborative approach. Moreover, the findings highlighted hierarchical dynamics, as nurses more likely to agree with others' decisions, whereas physicians were less engaged in passive agreement. Moreover, students observed that stress and tension were more prevalent among physicians than nurses.

conclusionThe study highlights the complementary yet distinct roles of nurses and physicians in clinical settings, underscoring the importance of balanced teamwork. Addressing hierarchical dynamics and enhancing communication are crucial for improving both patient care and job satisfaction. Therefore, training programs should focus on mitigating these barriers and fostering open communication to build a more cohesive healthcare environment.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelInternship and ResidencyPhysician-Nurse RelationsStudents, MedicalAdultCommunicationCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansInterprofessional RelationsMaleQualitative ResearchYoung Adultinterprofessional collaborationInterprofessional educationmedical studentsnurse-physician interactionqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40336470
PMCPMC12064097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.