ArticleSouth African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care2025
Stakeholders' views on public-private partnerships for rehabilitation services in South Africa ahead of National Health Insurance.
Article in South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SPINE20 recommendations 2025: Sustainable spine care for all.Brain & spine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuality rehabilitation services are limited in rural South African areas, such as KwaZulu-Natal (KZN). Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are increasingly valued as an effective model for public health delivery in developing countries; yet, their application in South Africa's rehabilitation sector, especially with the upcoming National Health Insurance (NHI) for universal health coverage, remains unclear. This study examined perspectives on using PPPs for rehabilitation services within the District Health System in KZN in preparation for the NHI.
methodsA qualitative study in eThekwini, Amajuba and King Cetshwayo districts of KZN included 57 participants, selected through purposive sampling. Participants were rehabilitation practitioners, managers and social development representatives. Data were collected via focus groups and interviews and analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsParticipants noted that the NHI's strategy of incorporating the private sector is designed to alleviate government pressure and provide financial incentives. Challenges mentioned include service availability, patient care and tariff disputes. Discrepancies between public and private sectors and the private sector's financial sensitivities pose significant challenges to NHI implementation. A knowledge gap exists regarding the role of PPPs in the NHI context for rehabilitation services. Practitioners emphasised the necessity of adequate government funding for private sector partnerships to strengthen public health infrastructure.
conclusionStakeholders express varied views on PPPs for rehabilitation, highlighting the need for clear guidelines and funding support as South Africa nears NHI implementation.Contribution: This study provides insights into stakeholders' views on PPPs for rehabilitation, identifying key benefits and challenges to inform effective NHI-aligned implementation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.