ArticleSouth African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care2025
Fall risk screening: Audiologists' perceived knowledge, views and reported practice.
Article in South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Discrepancies between fall risk and fall awareness in hospitalized elderly patients with cataracts: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFalls among older adults are a major public health issue. In South Africa, where the elderly population is expected to quadruple within the next three decades, fall prevention is critical.
methodsThis study evaluated South African audiologists' perceived knowledge, views and reported practices regarding fall risk screening (FRS) in older adults. A quantitative online survey was conducted using an adapted questionnaire designed to assess various aspects of FRS practice. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
resultsThe survey received responses from 106 audiologists. Most respondents reported using familiar tools, such as case history and vestibular assessments, to conduct FRS, with fewer utilising functional balance measures. Only 11% of audiologists reported prior knowledge of FRS, while 69% - 74% perceived their knowledge as insufficient to screen or counsel older adults. While 58% recognised FRS as part of the audiologist's scope, only 21% felt comfortable conducting it. Key barriers included insufficient training (80%) and time constraints (48%). Despite this, 98% expressed interest in learning about FRS and 90% believed FRS could enhance the profession.
conclusionThe findings underscore the need for improved clinical guidelines, educational initiatives and practice standards to better equip audiologists in fall prevention efforts and a collaborative approach to fall risk management for older adults.Contribution: This study emphasises the importance of incorporating FRS into undergraduate audiology curricula and continuous professional development programmes and encourages the use of a biopsychosocial approach and collaboration among multidisciplinary teams in fall risk management for older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.