ArticleAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2025
Exploring the gastric cancer care pathway in South Africa.
Article in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric cancer (GC) diagnosis and care data in South Africa (SA) is sparse, and SA has a high GC mortality rate. Mapping the GC care pathway is needed to explore its efficacy in association with the SA GC burden and mortality.
aimThe study aims to map the GC care pathway in SA from diagnosis to management by healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in the GC patient journey and explore barriers and facilitators to the effective flow of the GC care pathway.
settingInterviews conducted with South African HCPs were the data source used in this article for analysis. General physicians (GP) were the first contact point with chain-referral sampling sourcing other clinicians.
methodsInterviews were conducted via Microsoft Teams (MS Teams) and Google Meet with qualitative analyses via MAXQDA.
resultsThemes identified were GC care pathway processes, public versus private healthcare system differences and care pathway challenges. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) care is practised for GC in SA, starting with the GP or nurse followed by gastroenterologist (GI), surgeon and pathologist. Thereafter, nurses, dieticians and palliative care specialists are involved. Healthcare sector differences are diagnosis time, GC staging, HCP and treatment access. Challenges include low GC index of suspicion by primary care clinicians (PCC) and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) detection.
conclusionA MDT approach for optimal treatment and patient care may be the best method for prolonged life.Contribution: A South African national consensus for GC care via a MDT, emphasising early diagnosis to aid in a robust treatment plan for improved patient outcomes is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.