ArticleNano letters2025
Lowering Ionic Strength Improves the Sensitivity of Microtubule Gliding Assay Based Molecular Detection.
Article in Nano letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microtubule gliding assays provide a unique mechanism for molecular detection in which binding of analytes to the microtubule lattice reduces the microtubule gliding speed. The reduction in the gliding speed correlates with the density of the bound analytes, enabling its quantification. Although promising, this technique is still in the proof-of-concept stage. Improving the sensitivity and limit of detection of the assay could make the technique comparable to that of advanced molecular detection methods. This study demonstrates that reducing the ionic strength of the buffer increases the sensitivity of the assay by enhancing the interactions between kinesin and microtubules. When using a low ionic strength buffer (BRB10) compared with a standard buffer (BRB80), we observed a more pronounced reduction in microtubule gliding speed in the presence of analytes, improving the detection limit. Therefore, this approach offers a simple and scalable way to improve the sensitivity of motor-based detection assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.