ArticleHaematologica2025
Improved outcomes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation with highdose post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in the era of more effective pre-transplant therapy.
Article in Haematologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Implications of CD19-Negative Relapse Following CD19-Directed Therapy in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Advancements in diagnosis and treatments of acute leukemia.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Blinatumomab and better BCR::ABL1 inhibition begets better bone marrow transplant outcomes.Haematologica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The therapeutic landscape in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has changed dramatically over the last decade. Allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT) has also evolved and remains an important option for consolidation. We assessed the interplay between these factors by analyzing the outcomes of 251 adult ALL (214 B- and 37 T-ALL) patients undergoing alloBMT with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide across two eras: 2008-2014 (ERA1) and 2015-2022 (ERA2). ERA1 patients were younger (median age 45.5 years vs. 50 years, P=0.03), less likely to have a Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant-Comorbidity Index score ≥4 (9% vs. 21%, P=0.01), more likely to have measurable residual disease by flow cytometry (20% vs. 9%, P=0.01), and receive myeloablative conditioning (56% vs. 3%, P<0.0001). Overall survival (OS) (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.54, P=0.005), relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR: 0.52, P=0.001), and relapse (HR: 0.45, P=0.0005) were improved in ERA2. Non-relapse mortality was similar between eras (HR: 0.88, P=0.73). Significant improvements in OS (HR 0.49, P=0.004) and RFS (HR: 0.46, P=0.0004) in ERA2 due to fewer relapses (HR: 0.38, P=0.0003) were restricted to patients with B-ALL. Irrespective of era, B-ALL patients transplanted in first remission (CR1) had improved RFS (HR: 0.40, P=0.05) if they received pre-transplant blinatumomab. Similarly, Philadelphia chromosome-positve ALL patients transplanted in CR1 who received 2nd or 3rd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors at diagnosis had improved RFS (HR: 0.29, P=0.0004) and reduced relapse (HR: 0.23, P=0.002) compared to those who received imatinib. Improved alloBMT outcomes in ERA2 in spite of older patient age, increased co-morbidities, and less intensive conditioning were due to reductions in relapse likely driven by changes in pre-transplant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.