Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40336185›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025

The Ponto Bone-Anchored Hearing System - Benefits Following Radical Mastoidectomy.

Piotr H Skarżyński, Anna Ratuszniak, Anita Obrycka, Artur Lorens, Henryk Skarżyński

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. The Bonebridge Active Bone Conduction Hearing Implant: Safety, Effectiveness and Outcomes Based on 355 Patients.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Piotr H SkarżyńskiDepartment of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4978-1915
Anna RatuszniakOtorhinolaryngo Surgery Clinic, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6925-0460
Anita ObryckaDepartment of Implant and Auditory Perception, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3053-229X
Artur LorensDepartment of Implant and Auditory Perception, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8618-7651
Henryk SkarżyńskiOtorhinolaryngo Surgery Clinic, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7141-9851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma requires surgical treatment. One technique used is radical modified mastoidectomy. However, if there is subsequent hearing loss, the patient will often need to be provided with a hearing prosthesis, and one option is to use a bone-anchored hearing device. One of the percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aids available in clinical practice is the Ponto system (Oticon Medical). MATERIAL AND METHODS There were 27 patients enrolled in this study (13 females, 14 males), all of whom had previously undergone radical modified mastoidectomy. They were implanted with the Ponto bone-anchored hearing device from Oticon Medical. The mean age of the subjects at implantation was 59 years (36-75 years, SD=11). Five patients had moderate conductive hearing loss in the implanted ear, and 22 had moderate to very severe mixed hearing loss. Benefits of the Ponto system were assessed using tone and speech audiometry (free-field), as well as with APHAB (Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit) and SSQ (Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale) questionnaires. RESULTS The Ponto system resulted in a statistically significant improvement in hearing sensitivity and speech discrimination. The questionnaires confirmed the benefits of the Ponto system under various acoustic conditions. CONCLUSIONS Ponto was found to be a safe and effective tool in compensating for conductive or mixed hearing loss after radical modified mastoidectomy. The system can provide good support for auditory function in people who are at risk of recurrent otitis media with cholesteatoma and who may therefore require subsequent revision or further surgical intervention.

Indexed as

Bone-Anchored ProsthesisHearing AidsMastoidectomyAdultAgedFemaleHearing LossHearing Loss, ConductiveHumansMaleMastoidMiddle AgedOtitis MediaSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40336185
PMCPMC12070815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.