Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40336167›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Stage of pregnancy impacts the bacterial communities of reproductive and placental tissues in gilts.

Kyle J Hickman-Brown, Dallas R Soffa, Molly S Smith, Brooke E McAnally, Fuller W Bazer, Greg A Johnson, Jeffrey G Wiegert, Rebecca K Poole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kyle J Hickman-BrownDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Dallas R SoffaDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Molly S SmithDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Brooke E McAnallyDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Fuller W BazerDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Greg A JohnsonDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Jeffrey G WiegertDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Rebecca K PooleDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5202-0578

Funding

Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive 2022-67015-36376Department of Animal Science and College of Agriculture and Life SciencesNational Institute of Food and Agriculture
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial communities within the female reproductive tract have previously been linked to fertility status in mammals, however, minimal research has focused on reproductive microbiota in swine. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to compare and analyze the composition and α- and β-diversity of bacterial populations of different reproductive tissues (i.e., vagina, cervix, endometrium, and chorion) and placental fluids (i.e., allantoic and amniotic) in cyclic or pregnant gilts throughout gestation. Crossbred gilts free of physical, health, or reproductive-related issues were euthanized, hysterectomized, and sampled during diestrus (n = 5; cyclic) or on day 11 (n = 11; peri-implantation), 15 (n = 10; implantation), 60 (n = 6; mid-gestation), or 90 (n = 6; late-gestation) of pregnancy. A sterile swab was rotated 8 times to collect samples from the mucosal surface of individual tissues and immediately placed in microcentrifuge tubes for storage (-80 °C) until sequencing. For allantoic and amniotic fluids, 5 mL samples were collected and placed immediately in a sterile 10 mL conical tube and stored (-80 °C) for subsequent analyses. Bacterial DNA was extracted, and genome sequencing targeting the V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene was conducted. The relative abundance of Fusobacterium was more abundant (P < 0.05) in the vagina compared to all tissues and fluids across all days except in day 90 gilts, while the relative abundance of Lactobacillus was more abundant in allantoic fluid than the endometrium at day 60 (P < 0.05). Alpha-diversity (Shannon's and Simpson's index) was lower in amniotic fluid compared to other tissues (P < 0.05), but there were no differences in α-diversity by day of pregnancy or between cyclic and pregnant gilts (P > 0.05). Beta-diversity revealed distinct clustering by tissue type, with posterior tissues such as the vagina clustering separately from placental fluids, and by day, with cyclic, day 11, and 15 samples clustering separately from day 60 and 90 samples (P < 0.01). These findings suggest that bacterial communities within the reproductive tract are dynamic and vary by both anatomical location and stage of pregnancy in gilts.

Indexed as

BacteriaGenitalia, FemaleMicrobiotaPlacentaPregnancy, AnimalAnimalsFemalePregnancyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwineVaginaRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sbacterial diversitygiltlactobacillusmicrobiotapregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40336167
PMCPMC12132795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.