Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40336127›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2025

Multidisciplinary intervention for adverse events associated with ATZ + BEV therapy: a case report.

Ko Masaki, Motoyasu Miyzaki, Kota Mashima, Yasutaka Sumi, Kohei Noda, Syohei Ueno, Takashi Tanaka, Nobutaka Takahashi, Susumu Kaneshige, Hidetoshi Kamimura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ko MasakiDepartment of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jounan, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan. masakikou@fukuoka-u.ac.jp.
Motoyasu MiyzakiDepartment of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, 1-1-1 Zokumyouin, Chikushino, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kota MashimaDepartment of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jounan, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Yasutaka SumiDepartment of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, 1-1-1 Zokumyouin, Chikushino, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kohei NodaDepartment of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jounan, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Syohei UenoDepartment of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jounan, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Takashi TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jounan, Fukuoka, Japan.
Nobutaka TakahashiDepartment of Neurology, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jounan, Fukuoka, Japan.
Susumu KaneshigeDepartment of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jounan, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Hidetoshi KamimuraDepartment of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jounan, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtezolizumab (ATZ) plus bevacizumab (BEV) combination therapy has recently been approved for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including peripheral neuropathy, have also been reported. This case report describes a multidisciplinary intervention for a patient who developed peripheral neuropathy as an irAE following ATZ+BEV combination therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 60-year-old man with a history of hypertension. ATZ + BEV combination therapy was initiated for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma on day 0. On day 6, he experienced a grade 2 hypertensive episode with a systolic blood pressure of 160 mmHg, despite being on amlodipine (5 mg) and azilsartan (20 mg). Based on the pharmacist's recommendations, the amlodipine dose was increased to 10 mg. However, as hypertension persisted, an additional 20 mg of azilsartan was prescribed, ultimately stabilizing the patient's blood pressure to approximately 110/60 mmHg. On day 23, the patient reported numbness in his extremities, which was later diagnosed as grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. Notably, data from the IMbrave150 trial indicated that the of peripheral neuropathy as an irAE was 1.5%. This prompted a consultation with a neurologist. Prednisolone (40 mg/day) was initiated on day 26, followed by steroid pulse therapy with methylprednisolone (1000 mg/day for three days) starting on day 37. Despite these interventions, the symptoms did not improve. Rehabilitation therapy was commenced on day 42 after steroid tapering. On day 48, the patient underwent a five-day course of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, which also failed to yield improvement. Rehabilitation efforts subsequently shifted to enhancing activities of daily living. Initially, the patient required assistance to stand and faced significant difficulty walking. With consistent strength and mobility training, the patient progressed to walking with crutches and demonstrated increased walking distance.

conclusionsThe pathophysiology of irAE-induced peripheral neuropathy associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors remains poorly understood. This case underscores the challenges of managing irAE-related neuropathy, which may exhibit limited responsiveness to conventional treatments. Early detection, timely intervention, and multidisciplinary approaches are crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and mitigating the impact of severe side effects.

Indexed as

AtezolizumabHepatocellular carcinomairAEPeripheral neuropathy

Identifiers

PMID40336127
PMCPMC12060392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.