Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40336122›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2025

Leveraging inter-organizational networks to scale up a sepsis recovery program: results from an application of the Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI) method.

Cheyenne R Wagi, Marc A Kowalkowski, Stephanie P Taylor, Aliza Randazzo, Asha Ganesan, Amit Khanal, Sarah A Birken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cheyenne R WagiDepartment of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. cwagi@wakehealth.edu.
Marc A KowalkowskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Hospital Medicine Wake Forest University School of Medicine Center for Health System Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Stephanie P TaylorDivision of Hospital Medicine University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Aliza RandazzoDepartment of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Asha GanesanCenter for Health System Sciences Atrium Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Amit KhanalDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Hospital Medicine Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Sarah A BirkenDepartment of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Funding

Duke Endowment 7056-SP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNearly two million adults in the United States are hospitalized with sepsis yearly, with survivors facing complications that result in high rates of hospital readmission and mortality after discharge. We demonstrated improved outcomes following discharge among sepsis survivors who participated in the Sepsis Transition And Recovery (STAR) program; however, important differences among hospitals require STAR's adaptation to facilitate its implementation and ensure its effectiveness in new settings. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to adapt STAR to hospitals with diverse characteristics.

methodsWe used the Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI) approach. We identified STAR core functions (i.e., effectiveness-driving features) using semi-structured key informant interviews (n = 7). We identified adaptations using semi-structured interviews with clinicians and leaders with expertise and oversight of resources related to transitions of care after sepsis hospitalization (n = 7) from four hospitals that systematically differed from the hospitals in which we originally found STAR to be effective.

resultsNetwork theory, which proposes that performance improves with more efficient flow of information within and across hospitals, underlays STAR's eleven core functions. Adaptation included specific points-of-contact, communication preferences, and methods for achieving buy-in. We used proposed adaptations to tailor STAR protocols to each hospital.

conclusionsWe used MODIFI, a state-of-the-science method, to adapt a program that was effective in promoting transition and recovery in sepsis survivors to facilitate its scale-up to diverse hospitals. Future studies will assess STAR's implementation and effectiveness in diverse hospitals.

Indexed as

AdaptationsCore FunctionsEvidence-Based InterventionMODIFI for Implementation ScienceNetwork TheorySepsis

Identifiers

PMID40336122
PMCPMC12060418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.