Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40336081›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

Optimal immunization strategies for Saanen goats against goatpox.

Hossein Esmaeili, Seyed Mehdi Joghataei, Zeinab Hamidiya, Ehsan Baghal Arani, Amir Pasha Shakeri, Zia Nosrat Rad, Mohammad Mahdi Safari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hossein EsmaeiliDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. hesmaeli@ut.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6325-6984
Seyed Mehdi JoghataeiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Zeinab HamidiyaDepartment of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Ehsan Baghal AraniDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Pasha ShakeriDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Zia Nosrat RadDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Mahdi SafariDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGoatpox is a highly contagious disease caused by the Capripoxvirus, primarily affecting sheep and goats. Breeds like the Saanen are particularly vulnerable, especially in enzootic areas, and face risks not only from the disease itself but also from adverse reactions to live attenuated vaccines. This study compares inactivated and attenuated vaccines to find the safest and most effective vaccination strategy for Saanen goats against the Goatpox Virus (GTPV). In this study, 375 pure-breed Saanen goats were strategically divided into four groups to explore the most effective vaccination protocols for combating combinations of vaccines. In contrast, one group remained unvaccinated as a control. After vaccination, the goats were challenged by exposure to naturally infected animals to assess the vaccines' protective efficacy. PCR assays and the Virus Neutralization method were also conducted.

resultsGroup G1 exhibited no adverse reactions following two inactivated vaccines, with only mild and brief signs observed in a small number of goats (2%) after the live attenuated vaccine. Group G2, which received an inactivated vaccine followed by a live attenuated vaccine, had mild lesions in 18.66% of the goats after vaccination. In contrast, Group G3, which only received the live attenuated vaccine, showed a high morbidity rate of 82% and a mortality rate of 22%, with severe clinical signs and Pox lesions. Following the challenge, no signs of GTPV infection were observed in Groups G1, G2, and G3, whereas the control group exhibited 100% morbidity and 72% mortality, confirming the vaccine's protective efficacy.

conclusionThis study found that a protocol using two inactivated vaccine doses at one-month intervals, followed by a live attenuated vaccine and annual boosters, effectively immunizes vulnerable breeds against GTPV without causing adverse reactions. This approach prevents complications and supports breeding in GTPV-enzootic regions.

Indexed as

CapripoxvirusGoat DiseasesPoxviridae InfectionsVaccinationViral VaccinesAnimalsFemaleGoatsMaleVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, InactivatedVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, InactivatedViral VaccinesGoatpoxGoatsLive attenuated goatpox vaccinePox lesionsSaanenVaccination

Identifiers

PMID40336081
PMCPMC12060465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.