SynthesisOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
The prevalence of spontaneous pneumothorax in patients with BHD syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multicenter Registry for Rare Interstitial Lung Diseases in Korea: Baseline Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2026Article
- Experience in Molecular Genetic Diagnostics of Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome: Characteristics of Identified Mutations and Evolution of the Methodological Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Diffuse cystic lung diseases-a primer for radiologists.BJR open · 2026Review
- Asynchronous Bilateral Pneumothorax in a Patient With Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBirt-Hogg-Dubé (BHD) syndrome is associated with an increased risk of pneumothorax. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of spontaneous pneumothorax among individuals diagnosed with BHD syndrome.
methodA comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases up to March 10, 2024. Studies reporting on the prevalence of spontaneous pneumothorax in BHD syndrome patients were included. Eligibility assessment, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Random-effects or fixed-effect models were conducted to calculate pooled incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity. The publication bias was assessed by funnel plot and Egger's test.
resultsEighteen studies, conducted between 2009 and 2023, were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled incidence rate of spontaneous pneumothorax in BHD syndrome patients at 0.61 (95% CI 0.46; 0.76). Subgroup analyses based on region, study design, and diagnostic methods further elucidated variations in incidence rates among different patient groups. Specifically, the Asian subgroup demonstrated a higher pooled incidence rate of 0.71 (95% CI 0.60; 0.81), while the Caucasian subgroup showed a lower pooled incidence rate of 0.43 (95% CI 0.26; 0.60). The subgroup analysis by study design revealed a pooled incidence rate of 0.60 (95% CI 0.45; 0.76) for retrospective studies and 0.70 (95% CI 0.42; 0.98) for the sole prospective study. Additionally, the subgroup analysis by diagnostic methods showed pooled incidence rates of 0.64 (95% CI 0.48; 0.81) for studies using FLCN mutation testing and 0.51 (95% CI 0.33; 0.70) for those using clinical criteria and imaging findings. Potential publication bias was identified by Egger's test (P < 0.05).
conclusionThe study indicated a pooled prevalence rate of 61% for pneumothorax in BHD syndrome patients, with subgroup analyses revealing higher rates among Asian individuals and in prospective studies. Further researches, particularly large-sample prospective studies, are needed to address publication bias and improve the reliability of prevalence estimates. PROSPERO: CRD42024567520.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.