SynthesisBMC urology2025
Does the surgeon's learning curve impact pentafecta outcomes in radical prostatectomy? a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evolving landscape of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A comprehensive review of surgical techniques.Investigative and clinical urology · 2026Review
- Article
- Safe to Spare? Predictors of Oncological Safety for Nerve-Sparing Technique during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer. Insight from a High Volume Center with Centralized mpMRI Review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRadical prostatectomy is a key treatment for prostate cancer. However, the impact of the learning curve of the surgeon has on the pentafecta is unclear. This meta-analysis aims to determine the impact of a procedure being performed in the initial learning curve has on the surgical results. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted up to March 2024, focusing on learning curves in prostatectomy. Primary outcome was biochemical recurrence rate (BCR); secondary outcomes included positive surgical margin (PSM) rate, continence, potency, operative time, blood loss, and complications (Clavien-Dindo classification). Bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool, and statistical analysis was done via Review Manager 5.4.
resultsSixteen studies with 21,851 patients were included. No significant difference in BCR rates was found between initial and advanced learning curves (OR1.44;95%CI0.97,2.13;p = 0.07;I²=74%). No significant difference in continence rates was also observed. (RD-0.05;95CI-0.10,0.01;p = 0.08;I²=86%). However, advanced learning curves showed lower PSM rates (OR1.61;95%CI1.19,2.17;p = 0.002;I²=88%), higher potency, less blood loss, shorter operative time, and fewer complications. Although randomized trials are unlikely in this context, further high-quality prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.
conclusionThis meta-analysis highlights that achieving favorable outcomes in key pentafecta parameters-particularly potency, continence, and complication rates-increases with surgical experience. These findings emphasize the value of structured mentorship and establishing surgical volume benchmarks in training programs. Our analysis suggests that reaching a threshold of 100 cases may be necessary to consistently attain optimal functional and perioperative results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.