Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40336015›Full record

ReviewPhilosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM2025

An investigation into mental illness and its comorbidities from the perspective of supervenience physicalism.

Ping Yang, Xinyue Zhang, Hongwen Song, Xiaochu Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ping YangSchool of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, Anhui, China.
Xinyue ZhangSchool of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, Anhui, China.
Hongwen SongSchool of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, Anhui, China. shw0519@ustc.edu.cn.
Xiaochu ZhangSchool of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, Anhui, China. zxcustc@ustc.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exploration into the origin of human spirituality has always been a hot spot with many unsolved questions in the philosophy of mind, and issues concerning mental illness and its comorbidities are still unclear. In the 1970s, Donald Davidson first proposed anomalous monism with the supervenience concept, a theory that both insists on physicalism and transcends traditional reductionism. This theory provides solid and accessible proof for perceiving the mind-body relationship of spiritual origin in a non-reductionist approach. This paper develops arguments in two aspects. First, three principles of anomalous monism are employed to explore the origin of mental illness. Second, the comorbidity of mental illness is explained with the help of the supervenience theory.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersSpiritualityComorbidityHumansPhilosophy, MedicalComorbidityMental illnessNon-reductive physicalismSupervenience

Identifiers

PMID40336015
PMCPMC12060330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.