Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40336012›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Low levels of awareness and motivation towards cancer prevention amongst the general public in Sweden: a cross-sectional study focusing on the European Code Against Cancer.

Cecilia Hultstrand, Ellen Brynskog, Andreas Karlsson Rosenblad, Anna-Lena Sunesson, Thomas Björk-Eriksson, Lena Sharp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A Mobile Exhibition to Advance Cancer Prevention Awareness: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Framework.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cecilia HultstrandRegional Cancer Centre North. Norrlands universitetssjukhus, Umeå, 901 85, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4212-8080
Ellen BrynskogRegional Cancer Centre West. Medicinaregatan 18G, Gothenburg, 413 90, Sweden. Ellen.brynskog@kau.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0221-6318
Andreas Karlsson RosenbladRegional Cancer Centre Stockholm-Gotland, Lindhagensgatan 98, Stockholm, 112 18, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3691-8326
Anna-Lena SunessonRegional Cancer Centre North. Norrlands universitetssjukhus, Umeå, 901 85, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3582-947X
Thomas Björk-ErikssonRegional Cancer Centre West. Medicinaregatan 18G, Gothenburg, 413 90, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3680-5196
Lena SharpDepartment of nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0818-6992

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe European Code Against Cancer (ECAC) aims to increase the awareness of modifiable cancer risk factors among the general public. A goal set by the European Commission was that 80% of European citizens should be aware of this code by 2025. This study aims to examine the awareness and attitudes towards the ECAC among the general public in Sweden.

methodsA randomly selected sample of 1520 Swedes (18-84 years old) were recruited from a survey panel and invited to respond to an online study-specific questionnaire. The questionnaire included general questions regarding cancer prevention, as well as awareness and attitudes specific to the ECAC. Data were analysed univariately and with adjusted logistic regression, using post-stratification weights based on gender, age, education, and expressed political party orientation.

resultsIn total, 3.7% of the respondents had heard about the ECAC before taking this survey. Respondents with a college/university education were more likely to have heard about the ECAC (odds ratio [OR] 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-4.06). Males (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.32-0.99), and those living alone (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.23-0.95) were less likely to have heard about the ECAC. In total, 60.6% of the respondents agreed with the ECAC recommendations, while 27.4% reported that their motivation to improve their lifestyle increased after reading the ECAC.

conclusionsAwareness of the ECAC among the general public in Sweden is very low. Still, a majority seem to agree with its recommendations. The results also indicate that the ECAC motivates some, but far from all, to improve their lifestyle habits to reduce their cancer risk. Consequently, further research is warranted on how the ECAC best could and should be used in order to improve cancer prevention awareness and motivation.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMotivationNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenYoung AdultCancer preventionEuropean code against CancerHealth literacy

Identifiers

PMID40336012
PMCPMC12057043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.