Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40335974›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2025

Perception of the ethical climate among hospital employees in a public healthcare system: a cross-sectional survey at the University Hospital of Split, Croatia.

Zrinka Hrgović, Luka Ursić, Jure Krstulović, Marin Viđak, Ljubo Znaor, Ana Marušić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zrinka HrgovićDepartment of Family Medicine, Health Center of Split- Dalmatia County, Split, Croatia. zrinkahrgovic@hotmail.com.ORCID 0009-0005-9950-4624
Luka UrsićDepartment of Research in Biomedicine and Health, Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-2469-2948
Jure KrstulovićUniversity of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.ORCID 0009-0009-7802-599X
Marin ViđakDepartment of Cardiology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-0341-9598
Ljubo ZnaorDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Split, Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-0569-0181
Ana MarušićDepartment of Research in Biomedicine and Health, Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-6272-0917

Funding

Ana Marušić IP-2019-04-4882Luka Ursić IP-2019-04-4882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this cross-sectional study, we assessed the ethical climate at the University Hospital of Split in Croatia and investigated its potential indicators.

methodsWe used a validated Croatian translation of the 36-item Ethical Climate Questionnaire, which we distributed online (via an e-mail sent by the hospital administration to hospital employees) and as a paper and pen survey directly to all hospital departments. We compared ECQ scores between doctors of medicine (MDs)/doctors of dental medicine (DMDs) and other employees; MDs/DMDs and nurses; employees working with patients and those not working with patients; and employees working in the ICU versus those not working in the ICU using the Mann-Whitney U test. We used linear regression to explore the relationship of each ethical climate with gender, age, degree level, and years spent working in the hospital.

resultsWe collected 325 physical and 222 online questionnaires (547 responses in total), after which we excluded 146 incomplete responses. This left 401 questionnaires for analysis, primarily from doctors (n = 175; 43.6%) and nursing staff (n = 131; 32.7%). The two dominant climates were 'Company rules' and 'Laws and professional codes'. Stratified by profession, we observed higher scores for 'Personal morality' among doctors of medicine or dental medicine, whereas the group comprising other health professionals and non-medical staff had higher scores for 'Team interests', 'Efficiency', 'Social responsibility', and 'Laws and professional codes'. In comparing nurses and doctors of medicine/dental medicine, we observed the former group had higher scores for 'Social responsibility', 'Efficiency', and 'Team interest', while the latter had higher scores for 'Personal morality'. Those who worked outside of the ICU had higher scores for 'Social responsibility' compared to those who did not. In the regression analyses, age was a significant positive predictor of the 'Laws and professional codes' climates, and years spent working in the hospital acted as a positive predictor of the 'Self-interest' climate.

conclusionA large university hospital center in a fully publicly funded national healthcare system has a positive ethical work climate, which could be further developed by further development and implementation of codes of ethics to outline expected behaviors from all employees.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHospitals, UniversityOrganizational CulturePersonnel, HospitalAdultCroatiaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMedical Staff, HospitalMiddle AgedNursing Staff, HospitalSurveys and QuestionnairesEthical climateEthical climate questionnaireEthicsHospital

Identifiers

PMID40335974
PMCPMC12060318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.