Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40335965›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2025

Deep learning approaches for classification tasks in medical X-ray, MRI, and ultrasound images: a scoping review.

Hafsa Laçi, Kozeta Sevrani, Sarfraz Iqbal

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hafsa LaçiDepartment of Statistics and Applied Informatics, Faculty of Economy, University of Tirana, Tirana, Albania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8925-1846
Kozeta SevraniDepartment of Statistics and Applied Informatics, Faculty of Economy, University of Tirana, Tirana, Albania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9368-3511
Sarfraz IqbalDepartment of Informatics, Faculty of Technology, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden. sarfraz.iqbal@lnu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4437-8297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical images occupy the largest part of the existing medical information and dealing with them is challenging not only in terms of management but also in terms of interpretation and analysis. Hence, analyzing, understanding, and classifying them, becomes a very expensive and time-consuming task, especially if performed manually. Deep learning is considered a good solution for image classification, segmentation, and transfer learning tasks since it offers a large number of algorithms to solve such complex problems. PRISMA-ScR guidelines have been followed to conduct the scoping review with the aim of exploring how deep learning is being used to classify a broad spectrum of diseases diagnosed using an X-ray, MRI, or Ultrasound image modality.Findings contribute to the existing research by outlining the characteristics of the adopted datasets and the preprocessing or augmentation techniques applied to them. The authors summarized all relevant studies based on the deep learning models used and the accuracy achieved for classification. Whenever possible, they included details about the hardware and software configurations, as well as the architectural components of the models employed. Moreover, the models that achieved the highest accuracy in disease classification were highlighted, along with their strengths. The authors also discussed the limitations of the current approaches and proposed future directions for medical image classification.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiographyHumansUltrasonographyDeep learningMedical image classificationMRIUltrasoundX-ray

Identifiers

PMID40335965
PMCPMC12057223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.