ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
From post-war reconstruction to the twenty-first century - ophthalmic pathology in Freiburg 1945-2015: review of 39,256 surgical specimens from various topographical regions collected over 71 years at a large German tertiary eye care centre.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOphthalmic pathology at the Eye Center at Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Germany, looks back on a tradition of more than 150 years. Surgical specimens and associated histological diagnoses have been archived since 1945. This study is the first of its size to include 39,256 specimens examined in a single ophthalmic pathology laboratory over 71 years.
methodsWe retrospectively studied ophthalmic pathology reports and clinical records of histological specimens archived between 1945 and 2015 and compared our results with 22 studies from the literature. Samples were grouped by localisation and histopathological diagnoses assigned to various categories. Both were coded and entered into a database together with the year of surgery, patient sex and age at excision.
resultsThe patients' age at surgery was documented in 38,845 cases (99%), of which 19,601 were female (50.5%) and 19,244 were male patients (49.5%). The bimodal frequency distribution of specimens by patient age has a similar shape to that recorded 1941-1995 for Atlanta, USA and 1959-2021 for the Swedish population. Most specimens originated from the eyelid (50%), followed by cornea (16%), conjunctiva (14%), eyeball (9.1%), temporal artery (3.9%) and other locations (6.7%) comprising 16 less frequent topographies. The proportion of eyelid (corneal, conjunctival) lesions significantly increased fourfold (fivefold, twofold) during our study period (each p < .001); that of enucleations and temporal artery biopsies decreased significantly 38- and 3.6-fold (each p < .001). Concurrently, the numbers of eyelid, corneal, conjunctival and temporal artery specimens have significantly grown (each p < .001). Annual sample numbers increased significantly across the various medical directors' tenures (1945-1967: median = 78; 1968-1987: median = 454; 1988-2002: median = 670; 2003-2015: median = 1,445) (p < .001).
conclusionsHistorical events, general population developments and new surgical techniques and treatment options caused changes in the occurrence of various ocular and periocular specimens. Our study data contribute to providing an overall picture of the nature and relative frequency of ocular conditions leading to surgical excision of specimens with subsequent histopathological examination. A continuous sharp increase in case numbers since 1987 clearly exceeds the demographic trend emphasising the ever-growing importance of the sub-speciality of ophthalmic pathology. Ideally, histopathological assessments should be conducted by experienced ophthalmologists with surgical and pathology expertise, or by experienced pathologists with ophthalmology expertise, to ensure optimal patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.