Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40335958›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Community-Based Health-Social Partnership Programme (C-HSPP) for enhancing self-care management among older adults: protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.

Wilson Yeung Yuk Kwok, Frances Kam Yuet Wong, Arkers Kwan Ching Wong, Jonathan Bayuo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05621720 (Adopting a Health-social Partnership Program to Promote Health and Self-care Management Among Older Adults in the Community), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05621720 narecruitingnot on this map

Adopting a Health-social Partnership Program to Promote Health and Self-care Management Among Older Adults in the Community: an Effectiveness-implementation Hybrid Design

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled788ConditionsHealthy AgingArmsCase management, Social control call and usual are
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wilson Yeung Yuk KwokSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China.
Frances Kam Yuet WongSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China. frances.wong@polyu.edu.hk.
Arkers Kwan Ching WongSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China.
Jonathan BayuoSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China.

Funding

the Research Fund Secretariat, Health Bureau, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region 18191101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global ageing population imposes increasing demands on healthcare and social systems. Integrating the health and social service sectors has been proposed as a preferred solution to support healthy ageing, yet implementation in real settings remains challenging. Using an implementation science framework, this protocol outlines a Type-2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation design to adopt localized strategies for a Community-Based Health-Social Partnership Programme (C-HSPP) and test its effectiveness in enhancing self-care management among older adults in the community.

methodsThis study has two primary foci: to evaluate both the effectiveness and the implementation outcomes of C-HSPP in a non-governmental organization that operates seven community elderly centres across Hong Kong. A cluster randomized controlled trial (CRCT) with a two-arm, matched-pair, pragmatic design has been adopted to evaluate the programme's effectiveness. Regarding implementation outcomes, the reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of the programme will be examined using multiple data sources with quantitative and qualitative data. The trial will include 732 older adults aged 60 or above from four matched pairs of community centres, with each paired centre randomly assigned to either the 12-week C-HSPP intervention or to the usual community services. The C-HSPP intervention features a comprehensive assessment-intervention-evaluation framework using the Omaha System with health-social case management. Data will be collected at three time-points: baseline, post-intervention, and three months post-intervention, with self-efficacy as the primary outcome and other health indicators as secondary outcomes. An effectiveness analysis will be conducted using mixed-effects models and generalized estimating equations, incorporating degrees-of-freedom corrections and adjustments for clustering. Regarding the implementation outcome analysis, quantitative data including service statistics and a satisfaction survey will be presented using descriptive analysis. Qualitative data involving interview transcripts will be analysed using directed content analysis. DISCUSSION: By simultaneously evaluating both clinical effectiveness and implementation outcomes, this study will validate the evidence-based intervention and identify facilitators and barriers in the implementation process. The findings will support the adoption of an effective evidence-based programme in real-world settings, provide insights on the implementation process to ensure its sustainability, and furnish evidence for policymakers to adopt an integrated health-social partnership programme in the community.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05621720, First Posted on 2022-11-18.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesSelf CareAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHong KongHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicProgram EvaluationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCommunity-dwelling older adultsEffectiveness-implementation hybrid designHealth-social partnershipImplementation scienceOmaha systemPrimary health careSelf-care

Identifiers

PMID40335958
PMCPMC12057252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.