Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40335950›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2025

Headache-attributed burden and a health-care needs assessment in Delhi and National Capital Region of India: estimates from a cross-sectional population-based study.

Anand Krishnan, Debashish Chowdhury, Ashish Duggal, Ritvik Amarchand, Andreas Husøy, Timothy J Steiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anand KrishnanAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Debashish ChowdhuryGB Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India.
Ashish DuggalGB Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India.
Ritvik AmarchandAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Andreas HusøyDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NorHead, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Timothy J SteinerDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NorHead, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway. t.steiner@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe have previously shown headache to be highly prevalent in Delhi and National Capital Region of northern India, as we did earlier in Karnataka State in the south. Here we present a complementary study performed contemporaneously of headache-attributed burden, along with a population health-care needs assessment.

methodsIn a cross-sectional study using the standardised methodology of the Global Campaign against Headache, we randomly selected households, and one member aged 18-65 years from each, making unannounced visits. Trained interviewers used the HARDSHIP questionnaire incorporating enquiry into various aspects of headache-attributed burden: symptom burden, lost health, impaired participation in daily activities, quality of life (QoL) and willingness to pay (WTP) for treatment. Enquiry included questions about headache yesterday (HY).

resultsOf N = 2,066, participants reporting headache in the past year spent 9.5% of their time with headache of moderate intensity (1.8 on the scale of 1-3). Population-level estimates of all time spent with headache were in the range 5.5-6.6%. On this measure, migraine (8.2%) was, at individual level, much more burdensome than tension-type headache (TTH) (1.7%), and females with migraine or TTH were more burdened (8.7% and 2.0% respectively) than males (6.0% and 1.0%). Migraine accounted for substantial health loss (3.6%) at individual level (disability weights from the Global Burden of Disease study factored in), but both measures of overall burden (QoL and WTP) found it greatest among those with probable medication-overuse headache (pMOH) or other causes of headache on ≥ 15 days/month (H15+), with TTH least. For all headache types, participation was more impaired in household than in paid work, the latter being little affected (overall, males 0.3 lost days/month, females 0.1). Impaired participation in social or leisure activities was close to unmeasurably low. Impaired participation from HY was 1.8% across all domains of activity. One quarter (26%) of the population aged 18-65 years would be expected to benefit from health care, meeting our criteria for need: 16.1% with migraine, 6.4% with H15+.

conclusionHeadache disorders in northern India are not only prevalent but also associated with high burden. One quarter of the adult population would benefit from professional headache care.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessHeadacheNeeds AssessmentAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBurden of diseaseGlobal Campaign against HeadacheHeadacheHealth-care needs assessmentIndiaMedication-overuse headacheMigrainePopulation-based studySouth East Asia regionTension-type headache

Identifiers

PMID40335950
PMCPMC12057160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.