Observational studyBMC cancer2025
Real-world analysis of treatment patterns, effectiveness, and safety of daratumumab-based regimens in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Observational study in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes Among Chinese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (CHAMP-MM).Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Threshold Price of Belantamab for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in China: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2026Article
- Treatment patterns, effectiveness, and safety of daratumumab-based regimens in Chinese patients with multiple myeloma: longer follow-up of the real-world MMY4032 study.Annals of hematology · 2026Observational
- Treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma in second relapse in Colombia (freedomm): a multicenter observational study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Real-World Progression-Free Survival and Healthcare Resource Utilization Associated with Daratumumab Use in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Patients in Italy.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Article
- Guidelines and consensus for minimal residual disease-adapted therapy in multiple myeloma from the Pan-Pacific multiple myeloma working group.Clinical hematology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDaratumumab is a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 with direct on-tumor and immunomodulatory mechanisms of action. Daratumumab-based treatment is a standard of care for multiple myeloma (MM) based on data from randomized controlled trials. Real-world studies, such as that presented here from China, provide important data to complement randomized trials.
methodsThis ongoing observational study describes real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with symptomatic, newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory MM treated with daratumumab in China. Patients must have received ≤ 3 prior lines of MM therapy. Data were collected prospectively and/or retrospectively, depending on time of treatment initiation. The primary study objective was to describe treatment patterns and clinical outcomes, and the secondary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of daratumumab treatment.
resultsAs of the cutoff date (April 30, 2023) for this analysis, 212 patients had received ≥ 1 dose of daratumumab at 13 sites in China. Regimens included daratumumab monotherapy (n = 22) and daratumumab combined with dexamethasone only (n = 21), proteasome inhibitors (PIs) ± dexamethasone (n = 57), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) ± dexamethasone (n = 72), PIs and IMiDs ± dexamethasone (n = 29), and other combinations (n = 11). Daratumumab was initiated by 16.5%, 53.3%, 16.5%, and 13.7% of patients across the first, second, third, and fourth lines of therapy, respectively. A best overall response of partial response or better was achieved by 71.8% of evaluable patients and very good partial response or better was achieved by 51.4% of patients. Estimated 6-month and 12-month progression-free survival rates were 84.3% and 75.0%, respectively. Outcomes were generally more favorable with daratumumab-based combinations than with daratumumab monotherapy. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 13.7% of patients, with pneumonia (4.7%) the only serious event in ≥ 5 patients. The most frequently reported adverse drug reactions were leukopenia (6.6%), neutropenia (5.7%), and thrombocytopenia (5.7%).
conclusionsThis observational study provides real-world insights into treatment decisions for Chinese patients with MM. The effectiveness and safety results support the use of daratumumab-based treatment as a standard-of-care therapy in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory MM. This study is ongoing, with continued collection of outcomes data during a longer follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.