ArticleBMC genomics2025
Comparative and evolutionary analysis of chloroplast genomes from five rare Styrax species.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative plastid genomics of Gastrochilus (Orchidaceae) with insights into molecular markers and phylogeny.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Complex History of Organellar Introgression inEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes reveals molecular evolution and phylogenetic relationships in Styrax (Styracaceae).BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Gene loss and positively selected genes in chloroplast genomes reveal adaptive evolution in Styracaceae.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- The complete chloroplast genomes ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Complete chloroplast genomes provide insights into evolution and phylogenetic relationships ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Article
- Chloroplast Genome Diversity and Marker Potentials of DiverseInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Comparative chloroplast genomics of Rutaceae: structural divergence, adaptive evolution, and phylogenomic implications.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStyrax, a vital raw material for shipbuilding, construction, perfumes, and drugs, represents the largest and most diverse genus in the Styracaceae. However, there is a relative scarcity of research on Styrax, particularly in evolution and genetics. Therefore, this study conducted comparative and evolutionary analyses of the chloroplast genomes of five rare Styrax species (S. argentifolius, S. buchananii, S. chrysocarpus, S. finlaysonianus, and S. rhytidocarpus).
resultsThe results indicated that, despite high levels of conservation in chloroplast genome structure among these species, specific mutation hotspot regions exist, particularly involving the expansion and contraction of the IR region. Additionally, evidence of positive selection was detected in eight genes (atpB, ccsA, ndhD, petA, rbcL, rpoC1, ycf1, and ycf2), which may be associated with adaptive evolution in response to environmental changes. Phylogenetic analysis revealed conflicts between trees constructed based on coding sequences and complete chloroplast genomes for several species, which were similar to previous phylogenetic studies.
conclusionThis study underscores the importance of increasing sample sizes to enhance the accuracy of phylogenetic analyses and provides a new perspective on understanding the adaptive evolution of Styrax species. These findings are not only important for the conservation and sustainable use of Styrax, but also provide valuable insights for research in plant evolution and ecology within the genus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.