ArticleBMC medicine2025
A deep learning model combining circulating tumor cells and radiological features in the multi-classification of mediastinal lesions in comparison with thoracic surgeons: a large-scale retrospective study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fluoroscopic image-driven deep learning model for predicting intussusception irreducibility during air enema in children.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- A clinically applicable and generalizable deep learning model for anterior mediastinal tumors in CT images across multiple institutions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Liquid Biopsy in Early Screening of Cancers: Emerging Technologies and New Prospects.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCT images and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are indispensable for diagnosing the mediastinal lesions by providing radiological and intra-tumoral information. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep multimodal fusion network (DMFN) combining CTCs and CT images for the multi-classification of mediastinal lesions.
methodsIn this retrospective diagnostic study, we enrolled 1074 patients with 1500 enhanced CT images and 1074 CTCs results between Jan 1, 2020, and Dec 31, 2023. Patients were divided into the training cohort (n = 434), validation cohort (n = 288), and test cohort (n = 352). The DMFN and monomodal convolutional neural network (CNN) models were developed and validated using the CT images and CTCs results. The diagnostic performances of DMFN and monomodal CNN models were based on the Paraffin-embedded pathologies from surgical tissues. The predictive abilities were compared with thoracic resident physicians, attending physicians, and chief physicians by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and diagnostic results were visualized in the heatmap.
resultsFor binary classification, the predictive performances of DMFN (AUC = 0.941, 95% CI 0.901-0.982) were better than the monomodal CNN model (AUC = 0.710, 95% CI 0.664-0.756). In addition, the DMFN model achieved better predictive performances than the thoracic chief physicians, attending physicians, and resident physicians (P = 0.054, 0.020, 0.016) respectively. For the multiclassification, the DMFN achieved encouraging predictive abilities (AUC = 0.884, 95%CI 0.837-0.931), significantly outperforming the monomodal CNN (AUC = 0.722, 95%CI 0.705-0.739), also better than the chief physicians (AUC = 0.787, 95%CI 0.714-0.862), attending physicians (AUC = 0.632, 95%CI 0.612-0.654), and resident physicians (AUC = 0.541, 95%CI 0.508-0.574).
conclusionsThis study showed the feasibility and effectiveness of CNN model combing CT images and CTCs levels in predicting the diagnosis of mediastinal lesions. It could serve as a useful method to assist thoracic surgeons in improving diagnostic accuracy and has the potential to make management decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.