ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Deep learning assisted identification of SCUBE2 and SLC16 A5 combination in RNA-sequencing data as a novel specific potential diagnostic biomarker in prostate cancer.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual sagittal-guided coarse-to-fine rib segmentation and numbering in chest CT.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Identification of BCL11A, NTN5, and OGN as Diagnosis Biomarker of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinomas by Bioinformatic Analysis.Journal of kidney cancer and VHL · 2025Article
- Identification of Prognostic and Diagnostic Biomarkers for Glioma Utilizing Immune System Gene Profiling.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Article
- Cancer genetics and deep learning applications for diagnosis, prognosis, and categorization.Journal of biological methods · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the extensive use of biomarkers like PSA, AMACR, and PCA3, prostate cancer (PCa) is still a major clinical challenge, demanding the development of more precise and specific methods for diagnosis. In this study, a deep learning model was applied to identify ten key genes from a pool of 68 common differentially expressed genes in the three transcriptomic datasets. The model demonstrated high performance, with the accuracy of 0.969, R
Indexed as
Identifiers
40335872What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.